• twenty interoperable Smart Data schemes by 2035
• £36m of Industrial Strategy investment
• cross-sector Trust Frameworks and data sharing interoperability across the economy

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smart-data-strategy

For IB1, this is core to our work – and features the Perseus programme. It underpins how we will help deliver our sustainable economy into a data-enabled digital-first era, building the load-bearing foundations for trust, protecting our data rights, and delivering impact.

Open Banking took a decade to get right: we can now move much, much faster. The opportunity isn’t just ‘switching’, it’s opening up new markets and connecting financial flows to real-world outcomes at scale. The time to engage is now: the schemes being shaped today will define the data infrastructure of the next decade.

The UK has a great team helping to lead this, with Samantha as co-chair, the Department for Business and Trade (Siobhan, Agnieszka, Priya, and a growing support team), and non-govt Smart Data Council members including Henk, Adam, Liz, Charlie, Marie, Chris, Ezechi, Ghela, Helen, Joe, Josh , Louise, Maria, Nicola, Stephen, Jane, Lucy, Sue and many others across industry and government now engaged.

At Icebreaker One it’s what we’ve been building with IB1 Open Energy Perseus, STREAM and our Data Infrastructure work and we will continue to lead on Open Sustainable Finance.

Consumer-led Industrial and Commercial (I&C) flexibility allows large energy consumers (factories, retailers, office blocks, data centres, hospitals etc.) to adjust their net energy consumption for short periods in response to the needs of the grid, incentivised through flexibility markets.

In the electricity market, this enables demand to respond to supply, a crucial shift as sectors move towards electrification and as electricity production shifts to cheaper, cleaner, but more intermittent, renewable sources.

Flexibility forms up a core part of the government’s Clean Power 2030 Action Plan and is explored in depth in the Clean Flexibility Roadmap. It also delivers clear value, from reducing system costs for networks to unlocking new revenue streams and resilience for energy users. But, realising its full potential and accelerating the transition to Net Zero requires market-wide adoption.

Benefits of I&C flexibility

For grid operators, enabling flexibility can deliver:

• Reduced generation curtailment
• Reduced need for expensive grid-scale energy storage projects
• Reduced costs for grid capacity upgrades
• Alignment with Ofgem’s forthcoming RIIO-ED3 price control

For I&C Consumers, benefits include:

• Lower energy costs
• New revenue streams
• Reduced expenditure on grid connection upgrades
• Increased resilience for key consumers, such as hospitals, in times of grid stress

Data is the common thread

And yet, I&C flexibility isn’t one-size-fits-all. It encompasses a spectrum of approaches from direct demand response (where consumption is increased or decreased for a set period) to more sophisticated coordination of co-located technologies like solar, battery storage, heat pumps, and EV fleets.

What connects these approaches is data. Granular, trusted data sharing enables I&C sites to assess what options are feasible and maximise the benefits of participating in flexibility markets. Electricity networks also need real-time, high-quality data to plan and operate their networks, and to balance supply and demand. Without this, take-up of I&C flexibility will not reach its full potential, or will be costly to implement.

Sharing large amounts of data between diverse groups or organisations can lead to challenges including:

• Varying data formats, standards and semantics
• Separate representations of network assets and constraints
• Different data publication schedules
• Non-interoperable licensing and permissioning frameworks
• Issues with machine-readability
• Commercial and security sensitivities
• A lack of easy consumer data portability
• Fragmented data on existing I&C flexibility participation and performance

For I&C consumers, these barriers make it harder to identify viable flexibility opportunities and build robust business cases. This increases cost and complexity, often diverting time and investment elsewhere.

Unlocking flexibility at the speed and scale required to decarbonise the grid will therefore require a fundamental shift in how data is shared.

A data sharing scheme to accelerate I&C flexibility

The market needs a way for I&C actors to securely and easily share data with authorised parties to assess, plan and deliver flexibility at scale. Open Energy’s mission is to collaboratively define and develop a data sharing Scheme to support this, recognising that delivery is a co-ordination challenge, requiring collaboration to solve.

No single organisation can solve this alone, and implementing technical solutions without understanding the needs, constraints, and capabilities of others risks becoming an expensive exercise with unreliable outcomes.

The scheme will align with wider energy and cross sector initiatives such as NESO Data Sharing Infrastructure, RECCo Consumer Consent Solution, Elexon Flexibility Market Asset Register, Market-Wide Half-Hourly Settlement, and Smart Data policy), strengthening the overall data ecosystem and enabling interoperability.

Open Energy brings together energy system and I&C participants to build the data foundations for accelerating flexibility. IB1 acts as a neutral facilitator and data governance expert supported by the Energy Sector Trust Framework, a ready-to-use mechanism for governing the exchange of data in a consistent, trusted, and scalable way, without the need for centralised infrastructure.

How your organisation can benefit

If flexibility impacts your organisation, whether as an opportunity, a challenge, or a dependency, being part of Open Energy gives you a seat at the table, where the future of data sharing is being built. You’ll also help shape how the Energy Sector Trust Framework evolves to meet the specific needs of the flexibility market.

For networks:

• Contribute to, and benefit from, sector-wide alignment on data classification, licensing, and access controls
• Reduce the risk of costly inconsistencies emerging as flexibility markets mature.

For flexibility providers and aggregators:

• Access cleaner, more consistent data pipelines
• Access a governance framework that makes it easier to operate across multiple network areas.

For large energy consumers and trade bodies:

• Gain faster visibility of viable flexibility opportunities and incentives
• Access insights to support adoption and decision-making

Join us & your peers

To find out more about the Industrial & Commercial Flexibility use case, or to join Open Energy, get in touch with us at openenergy@ib1.org

And register for our upcoming webinar: https://events.humanitix.com/oe-i-and-cflex-webinar

The decisions being made now will shape the direction of the energy sector for years to come. Those helping to shape it will be best placed to benefit from the opportunities that follow.

Date: Tuesday 17 February 2026 11:00-12:30 GMT

Location: In person & online

Co-Chairs: Sara Vaughan & Gavin Starks

Secretariat: IB1

Meeting Aims 

1. Support for the use case for 2026
2. Support the governance process
3. Connect us with new potential members

Summary:

• It was agreed that:
  • The 2026 roadmap will move from engagement and prioritisation early in the year to implementation activity later in the year.
  • Remaining organisations will be asked to complete outstanding terms of reference signatures, where that is possible.
• It was noted that:
  • An update was given on activities since the last SG, including:
    • Government and Ofgem activity is increasingly focused on ensuring greater visibility of distributed and flexible energy assets.
    • Elexon has gone live with its flexibility market facilitator role, and the new Flexibility Commissioner has been announced.
    • NESO and XOSERVE have announced a strategic partnership on consolidation and sharing of gas data which will help facilitate and streamline whole-system planning.
    • Ofgem published its Forward Workplan for 2026/7.
    • RECCO published the design consultation on its Consumer Consent solution.
    • The intended publication of the DESNZ/Ofgem Digitalisation Vision in Q1 2026 was confirmed.
  • The Smart Data Council has resumed and is developing UK guidance for smart data schemes.
  • The Perseus programme has broad participation and commercial offerings are expected from 2026, with a £5-10bn SME opportunity by 2030.
  • Feedback to the Open Data access controls paper has been positive across the sector.
  • The 2026 priority use cases will focus on UC04 – cross-sector storm response or UC05 – industrial and commercial flexibility.
• It was discussed that:
  • Practical implementation and real use cases may be more persuasive to policymakers than theoretical proposals.
  • A Community Interest Company (CIC) based SPV funding model could support multi-year funding and participation from multiple network operators but, given IB1’s non-profit, public benefit status, there was not a strong case to change to such a model.

Next meeting: Thursday 7 May 2026 14:30-16:00 BST

Formal records, including attendees, are maintained by the secretariat. 

These are confidential to the Steering Group Members.

Please note that throughout this consultation, Icebreaker One uses the terms Open, Shared and Closed data as defined here.

If you have any questions about our submission or require clarifications please do not hesitate to contact us via policy@ib1.org.

Consultation response:

Regarding paragraph 3.36 in the Statutory Consultation on the RIIO-3 Licence Drafting modifications – reasons and effects document:

Generally IB1 supports a common Digitalisation Re-opener to encourage digitalisation by allowing network companies to seek funding for data and digital related projects with a broader scope than just IT hardware or software upgrades and to align with RIIO-ED2.

IB1 supports digitalisation as key for energy sector decarbonisation, and required for the investment in flex services and the coordination between sectors who rely on energy to meet their decarbonisation targets (water, transportation, built environment, industry).

IB1 supports sector-wide convening and governance to ensure digitalisation happens in a coordinated manner and can enable ‘whole system solutions,’ as promoted in RIIO-ED2 and realise the subsequent cost savings. IB1 supports Ofgem to continue to promote and finance whole system digitalisation coordination in RIIO-ED3.

As there are many ongoing data sharing and data governance initiatives e.g. consumer consent solution, flexibility services, Data Sharing Infrastructure (DSI), which are currently in progress at different stages of development (definition, prototype, or pilot). Ofgem should not expect these programmes and underlying challenges the projects aim to solve to be resolved by the end of RIIO-ED3 (2031). Data sharing and data governance needs and subsequent solutions will evolve over time as we continue to electrify and connect the UK’s grid. As mentioned above, Ofgem needs to ensure ongoing governance and sector collaboration on data and digitalisation – reinforcement of this would be welcomed in addition to specific plans to expand/evolve data governance initiatives.

With the progress of the Data Sharing Infrastructure (DSI) programme, IB1 anticipates ‘Shared Data’ sharing will evolve and will inform the evolution of data best practice (DBP) guidance. In particular, as data sharing scales, the need to standardise and harmonise legal and technical approaches will become more pressing in order not to slow innovation and add unnecessary cost. IB1 recommends that DBP should include guidance around Shared Data within the triage processes and licensing decisions, highlighting the role of Shared Data Schemes to provide definitions that aid interoperability and maximise impact.

Please note that throughout this consultation, Icebreaker One uses the terms Open, Shared and Closed data as defined here.

If you have any questions about our submission or require clarifications please do not hesitate to contact us via policy@ib1.org. We have omitted questions which we did not answer.

Consultation response:

Do you agree with the proposed implementation approach? Yes.

Rationale: We appreciate that there is a governance in place to discuss and approve the proposed implementation. We would welcome further transparency on the outcomes of applications to access data via this method and suggest that a summary of cases are made openly available after a 6-12 month trial period. Ongoing avenues for scrutiny remain important.

Please provide any further comments you may have.

As we are looking holistically at the smart meter data landscape, we will continue to work with the SEC and engage as it develops on a case by case basis and impacts wider use cases.

with Rohan Graham, Head of Asset Data, National Grid and Jay Chen, Data Process Administrator, IT&D Data Engineering and Process, NGED

Data sharing is key for reaching our net zero targets; this is something IB1’s strategic partner National Grid Electricity Distribution (NGED) has long recognised. And, as the company looks to cement its position as a digital leader in the energy industry, IB1 remains a key component and catalyst in accelerating its digitalisation journey. 

We caught up with Rohan Graham from National Grid and Jay Chen from NGED, to discuss how interoperability across Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) is fundamental to unlocking the potential of open data in the energy sector.

Building trusted open data

Last year, NGED identified a need to improve how it publishes assured open data. While the DNO had already established an open data portal, it wanted to review both what it was publishing and how it was publishing it. This shift signalled a commitment to providing data that is trusted, consistent and usable across the sector. 

“Our goal is to contribute to the broader movement of publishing interoperable assured open data, explore genuine shared-data use cases, and understand how to make that data available securely through trust frameworks, while considering and aligning to the DSI under development.” Rohan Graham. 

Sector-wide collaboration

NGED sits within a much wider ecosystem of UK DNOs, all of which publish similar datasets. Because these datasets are used across the energy sector, (not just within each DNO’s own business) ensuring their interoperability is essential.

To achieve the level of interoperability required and to build sector-wide collaboration, harmonisation is essential. Once in place, the value of this interoperability is far-reaching: it strengthens trust, encourages the wider use of data across the sector and ultimately accelerates the entire sector’s digital maturity. 

“Over the next 3-5 years, we’ll see the increase of interoperability of data between organisations as well as the increasing use of flexibility services across multiple DNOs.” Jay Chen, NGED. 

Data Action

The Data (Use and Access) Act might also be a catalyst for positive change in the sector. Its focus on the roll-out of smart data schemes is a move in the right direction. But, whether this alone will galvanise the sector toward a more connected, net-zero future remains to be seen.

“It’s definitely a positive move. It’s set up some of the frameworks for how Open Energy can be pushed forward, but really, the Act alone won’t create immediate change. Specific to Open Energy, the real push comes from facilitation by Icebreaker One, a common purpose and active participation from members of the ecosystem.” 

Rohan Graham, National Grid

IB1: The great facilitator 

Through our Open Energy programme, IB1 has helped to establish best practices for publishing open data; focusing on machine readability, standardised metadata and overall consistency; all of which help to facilitate trust across the sector. 

“Working with IB1 has been really valuable in providing awareness, guidance, and direction, mainly from an open data perspective, so far. One of the biggest benefits has been driving the collaboration between the DNOs through steering and working groups. This kind of collaboration is crucial for progressing interoperability and shared best practices”. Rohan Graham.

“Our strategic partnership enables NGED to have a driving seat in shaping the future of decarbonisation through working groups with sector organisations, facilitated by IB1.”

Jay Chen, NGED

What’s next?

Looking ahead, National Grid is set to continue its progress toward a more connected, digital energy system. Central to achieving this vision is the ability to continue identifying datasets that truly move the dial on flexible energy markets and decarbonisation.

“Understanding who needs that data, why they need it, and how to deliver it securely and at scale will be key. The sector needs to  remain focused on publishing what truly drives progress toward net zero – whether that’s open or shared data.” Rohan Graham. 

IB1’s work in Open Energy is creating a connected web of energy data – making it more discoverable, interoperable, and impactful, in the collective mission to reach net zero.

If you’re interested in becoming a Strategic Partner, an Open Energy member, or part of our expert network, you can join us at ib1.org/join or reach out at partners@ib1.org to start a conversation about unlocking data for net zero.

A draft of this position paper was circulated ahead of a licensee working group meeting held on November 26, 2025. Following input from the workshop, this updated draft is being circulated for further feedback from wider energy data stakeholders. 

Open Energy members hope that all RIIO-2 licensees, and the users of their data, will benefit from a clearly-articulated position on Open Data classification and access control. They would particularly welcome feedback from licensees who use third-party data platforms.

The Google version of the position paper is open to comments. Alternatively, interested parties may download a Word version. 

Please send comments or feedback to openenergy@ib1.org before February 2, 2026.

Key points from the position paper

RIIO-2 licensees that are members of Open Energy will:

• Adopt and enact an updated Assured Open Data definition that includes purposes for registration:

• D1.5.3 Anonymous downloads of open data is strongly preferred, but where the dataset requires compulsory registration before download:
  • D1.5.3.1 Registration is only conditional on completion of a lightweight challenge necessary for technical measures to minimise spam and bot abuse, such as verifying receipt of an email
  • D1.5.3.2 Acceptance of registration is automatic and immediate
  • D1.5.3.3 Registration may only be denied or withdrawn for misuse
  • D1.5.3.4 The registration process does not introduce any barriers to automated downloads or API access. Access to data is identical in all respects to a simple HTTP download of a published URL or API, except for the addition of a static credential or token that does not need renewing
  • D1.5.3.5 Require additional opt-in consent to use registration data for any further purpose. Data access must not be made conditional on obtaining any additional consents (e.g. use of registration data for analytics)
  • D1.5.3.6 If registration is only available via a third party platform (Data Controller), the third party must also comply with conditions D1.5.3.1 – D 1.5.3.5
  • D1.5.3.7 Third parties must transparently provide privacy policies and terms and conditions to the user if/where these differ from those of the Data Publisher.

• Apply the definition to metadata and data, meaning either or both may require registration
• Classify data requiring this form of registration as Open
• Licence data requiring this form of registration with either CC-BY-4.0 or OGLv3
• Implement information on registration forms/access gating screens making clear the purpose of this form of registration to end users and work with other licensees to align this language
• As required for compliance with UK GDPR, ensure privacy policies correctly reflect the use and protection of registration data, the length of time the data will be held, the situations where it would be disclosed
• Ensure terms of service for data portals do not contradict the Open Data licence being asserted for datasets on the portals
• Provide information in the registration process and/or the dataset listings that clearly separates Open Data “lightweight” registration from Shared Data registration requirements where registration may be used for other purposes, including limitations on access or use of the data
• Use registration as an opportunity, on a strictly opt-in basis, to provide additional benefits to users such as subscription to dataset update notifications or notifications of training opportunities

Date: 25 November 2025 11:00-12:30 GMT

Location: Online

Co-Chairs: Sara Vaughan & Gavin Starks

Secretariat: IB1

Meeting Aims 

1. Understand the reactions to the Architecture coordinator open letter
2. Update on Open Energy activities and webinar

Summary:

• It was noted that:
  • A number of the Q4 goals are complete or in progress, and the IB1 team are working to realign those remaining to create a new plan for Q1 and Q2, which will be shared with members in January 2026.
  • There was good engagement and attendance at the webinar in October, with poll results revealing that uncertainty around sector-wide alignment is a major confidence barrier, with participant discussion reinforcing the need for a coordinated approach.
  • Driven by the Data Use and Access Act, data sharing initiatives are starting to form across the economy.
  • As one of the more mature sectors for data sharing, the energy sector is experiencing concerns over misalignment that will likely play out in other sectors, and it has an opportunity to demonstrate how the co-ordination function should operate.
• It was agreed that:
  • Without further clarity on the venn diagram of roles within the industry, and who should be at the helm, the industry faces a significant financial risk of duplication and over-spending, leading to this transformation costing much more than it needs to; and
  • There is fragmentation across the industry with a lack of coherence around the venn diagram of roles, and who should be coordinating, orchestrating and determining the future developments.
  • Developing a Market Architecture would help to shape the governing process along with who the relevant actors are and what their contributions should be, providing clarity to the industry.
  • This does not have to be a single body, it could be a community of actors working together within some sort of governing body. A not-for-profit could be used to bring this together.
• It was noted that:
  • There are competing views on the value of a use case-based approach. However, many members feel that use cases are essential to be able to work on achievable priorities within the industry and make informed decisions about data protection and security.
  • It’s important to take note of the work that RECCo is undertaking, particularly what trust framework RECCo provides and how that is then used by the broader market. This highlights the decisions that need to be made and where there is a requirement for a coordinating function.
  • The question of ‘who is the final arbiter?’ that was posed during the last meeting, is yet to be resolved.
• It was discussed that:
  • While NESO holds the interim DSI role until 2028, it would be challenging for them, at least until then and possibly beyond without a change in the skills and capability of the organisation, to take up the role of a single, accountable organisation for digital co-ordination of the sector – although, in principle, this was the sort of role they should be fulfilling.
  • Other industries have placed an independent non-profit at the centre of their data-sharing arrangements, setting a successful precedent for the energy industry to follow.

So what’s the difference?

Standardisation is rooted in uniformity and harmonisation in compatibility. Depending on the situation, either can offer advantages to unlocking the effective use of data. To unpack this further: 

Data standardisation is the process of bringing data into a uniform format to ensure consistency and comparability. There is a choice of bases on which standardisation may be applied. In a previous post, we identified 13, ranging from file formats to governance.

Data harmonisation is about making disparate data sets interoperable. It’s crucial when dealing with multiple datasets with varied standards as it brings these diverse data sources together into a coherent, usable whole. 

To illustrate the difference, let’s take the example of car. The way fuel for cars is refined and distributed is standardised: petrol from any supplier is expected to work in any ordinary petrol engine. By contrast, a car’s interior controls are harmonised: every car must have a way to steer, accelerate and brake but there is no single layout for how those controls are arranged.

Why harmonisation matters: lessons from TNFD

Applying this to our recent work supporting the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), we can see why harmonisation is often essential. TNFD asked us to help develop their global data strategy and a set of principles for nature data. Early on, it became clear that nature data could not be reduced to a single standard because it spans water, soil, species, forests, and many other systems, each with its own metrics and methodologies. 

In a fragmented landscape like this, harmonisation serves as the connective tissue. It allows decision-makers to interpret nature-related risks, opportunities, and impacts through a more integrated view.

The benefits of harmonisation

Improved Decision-Making: Harmonised datasets offer a broader, richer, but still integrated view, enabling better-informed choices, particularly when decisions draw from multiple data sources.

Reduced Friction: Organisations can continue using the tools, formats, and definitions that work for them, while still contributing to an interoperable system.

Faster Collaboration: Harmonisation enables a shift from ‘agreeing on one way of doing things’ to ‘doing one thing well’, encouraging a focused, practical use-driven approach that drives alignment.

Why harmonisation fits IB1’s approach

These benefits are what makes harmonisation a natural fit for IB1’s use-case driven approach. In our Open Energy work, as we explore effective data-sharing use cases for the energy sector, we’re facilitating cross-sector collaboration with Distribution Network Operators (DNOs), regulators, and other stakeholders in the sector. Each has its own definitions, terminology, and internal standards. So how do they all agree on a common language? 

The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t need to. Expecting them to adopt one common language is unrealistic, time consuming and unnecessary. This would be a standardisation-first approach. Useful in some contexts, but often slow, costly, and difficult to achieve at scale. Instead, the approach is to pick a real-world use case and harmonise our approach across multiple stakeholders and data sets. Use cases give our working groups a practical focal point, allowing collaboration to form around specific needs. 

“We prefer to harmonise through utilisation and application rather than theorise and wait for a standard to be implemented”

Gavin Starks, CEO, IB1 at the Open Energy webinar. 

So when does standardisation have a part to play? 

Standardisation creates stability and comparability where consistent reporting is essential. For instance, this was the recommended approach in our Impact Investing report for COP28, where we advised organisations to require data-backed, standardised environmental reporting from their supply chains. This is crucial for decarbonisation and for accurate Scope 3 emissions reporting because stakeholders, consumers, investors and employees increasingly expect businesses to provide a full and trustworthy account of their value-chain emissions. 

Data standardisation, in this context, is the right way to go because it establishes a common baseline that ensures everyone is measuring and reporting emissions in the same way, enabling meaningful comparisons, credible disclosure, and targeted action.

Ultimately, harmonisation and standardisation both have roles to play. But, often in our work we encounter multi-stakeholder projects, with disparate data sets that require a harmonised solution. By grounding decisions in real use cases we’re able to find cross-sector solutions to real-world problems.

Sara Vaughan, Co-chair of the Open Energy Steering group, framed the start of the session by pointing to a lack of alignment in the sector which might be hindering progress. At the same time, she highlighted what sets Open Energy apart from other initiatives: the involvement from regulators, who are brought into the process to support and provide continued feedback.

This collaborative approach sits at the heart of Open Energy, as it brings the sector together to co-design the rulebook for data sharing and develop Trust Frameworks that unlock the value of energy data.

The data sharing landscape

As we progressed through the webinar, Chris Pointon, Product Manager, Trust Services, reflected on what Open Energy can build upon as it evolves. Themes included wider governance areas such as assurance, common identity services, and shared data infrastructure. Key to exploring these themes are actionable use cases. These give us a tangible grasp on user needs, and allow us to develop solutions that accurately address industry and consumer pain points.

Harmonisation over Standardisation

The focus on workable use cases also made up a large part of discussion in the Q&A segment and helped attendees to understand why harmonisation, not standardisation, is needed to guide the sector forward.

“While data standardisation focuses on uniformity, data harmonisation is about making disparate data sets interoperable”

Michael Glass, Data Governance and Information Manager at SSE posed a critical question:

“DNOs all have different internal definitions and languages that they use. How do they agree on a common language?”

The answer is to pick a use case that is supported by working groups and centre collaboration around it. By starting from real-world use cases, we can reduce cost and friction for everyone.

“That’s how we harmonise. Psychologically and operationally, it’s a much easier approach.” Gavin Starks, CEO, IB1.

The results are in

Towards the end of the webinar we conducted a poll asking our participants questions such as: ‘Which of these barriers affects your confidence’ to better understand whether uncertainty around data licensing, data access, data maturity, legal risk or alignment with the rest of the sector is holding them back.

Uncertainty about alignment with the rest of the sector made up a large portion of the vote, and echoed our previous discussions on the need for harmonisation.

What’s next?

We’re at a critical moment in the UK’s history around data sharing. Government departments now have significant budgets dedicated to designing smart data schemes, signalling real momentum.

But amidst this progress, we need a coordinated effort to ensure we navigate towards the low-cost, low-friction future we’ve all set out to achieve – one where collaboration across the sector shapes the future of trusted energy data sharing in the UK and beyond.

Looking ahead, we’re encouraging continued discussion through upcoming Open Energy Working Groups. The first session will take place on Wednesday 26 November, and will aim to develop a single, DNO-backed approach to align on the language and decisions discussed during the webinar.

Whilst the form is now closed, you can still join by emailing partners@ib1.org

So what is a smart meter?

A smart meter is a device that records and transmits your utility usage directly to your supplier, while also giving you insights into your own consumption. Most people are familiar with these household energy smart meters but much less so with water smart meters, which differ significantly in their design, purpose, and implementation. 

Not all smart meters are created equal

Smart water meters record a household’s water use and automatically send this information to the water company. According to Anglian Water, they can help customers detect leaks early, monitor their consumption, and receive alerts if their bill is unusually high. And, by encouraging more efficient water use, smart water meters play a valuable role in helping the UK move toward its net zero goals.

However, compared to energy smart meters, water smart meters typically offer less granular data and limited historical records – factors that can reduce their overall impact. You can explore the key differences between the two systems in the table at the bottom of this page.

Why does the Water Sector matter for net zero?

The water sector is an energy intensive one. In fact, the movement and treatment of water is said to create around 3 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions each year. This is because every time someone uses water, whether it’s turning on a tap, flushing a toilet, or doing laundry, energy is used to pump and treat drinking water, distribute it through the network, collect and treat wastewater. 

The more water we use, the more energy is needed, which leads to higher carbon emissions. And, we’re seeing a rising demand and consumption of water in the UK, with seven regions in England on track to become severely water stressed by 2030. If we are to reach our net zero targets, curbing our water consumption and preventing water wastage, should be top of the agenda. 

What can we learn from energy smart meters? 

While the water sector faces its own unique challenges, it can draw valuable lessons from the energy sector’s experience with smart meters. The rollout of energy smart meters is further advanced but has not been without difficulties – ranging from incomplete deployment to inconsistent functionality. Both the successes and the setbacks in this journey could provide the water sector with a useful blueprint to follow.

These lessons also hint at a larger problem that the technology itself isn’t enough. To fully unlock their benefits (whether in energy or water) we need a way to make smart meter data more accessible, usable, and secure.

That’s where smart data schemes come in. And, propelled by the recent passing of the Data (Use and Access) Act, smart data schemes could unlock the value of smart meters, paving the way for a much smarter energy system. 

But what exactly is a smart data scheme?

A smart data scheme is a framework that enables secure, customer-authorised data sharing between organisations. It supports Smart Data, which is “the process of sharing customer data, upon a customer’s request, with authorised third parties in a secure way. The term ‘Smart Data’ is often used interchangeably with ‘open X’, where X is banking, finance or any other sector”. (Department for Energy Security & Net Zero)

A prime example of a smart data scheme, already in action, is Open Energy. You can think of Open Energy as a smart data scheme, like Open Banking, but for the energy sector. It allows consumers and innovators to securely access and share energy data – unlocking better services, smarter tariffs, and encouraging more sustainable behaviour. 

To learn more about our work in Open Energy follow this link: https://ib1.org/energy/uk/ 

What’s the connection between smart meters and smart data schemes?

To put it simply: smart meters are the source of the data but smart data schemes are the key to creating meaningful impact with this data. 

“These meters create datasets that could accelerate energy efficiency and help encourage sustainable behaviours, but the data is currently challenging to access. With the ability to see exactly how much energy they use and when, consumers can optimise their habits and take advantage of smart tariffs that incentivise energy use during off-peak periods. This creates immediate financial benefits for households and drives the adoption of “smart” energy systems across the country. 

A Smart Data framework leveraging Smart Meter data could amplify these benefits by accelerating the use of flexible energy tariffs and technologies. Empowering consumers with real-time energy insights ensures that the transition to clean power is not just a policy objective but a grassroots movement supported by informed citizens.” Startup Coalition and TBI project – Smart Data Report.

Smart Data in action

A live example of a cross-sector smart data scheme is our Perseus project, which connects half-hourly smart meter data – with permission from SMEs – to the financial sector. This helps to unlock green financing from banks to accelerate SME decarbonisation efforts. In other words, it links real economy data to the financial economy through a smart data scheme. 

“Our work in Open Energy has led, directly, to initiatives like Perseus which is taking smart meter data, with permission from SMEs into the financial sector. It is Data Act ‘ready’ and I believe is the first national cross-sector Smart Data Scheme in the country” Gavin Starks, CEO, IB1. 

If you’re interested in being part of a smart data scheme, whether its Open Energy and Perseus, then please get in touch via: icebreaking@ib1.org 

Similarities and differences between household energy and water smart meter systems 

The Act (which covers both consumer and business data) places significant emphasis on Smart Data Schemes. These schemes, which enable secure, user-authorised data sharing between organisations, stand out as a transformative step for the UK economy.  

The benefits are far-reaching, with the potential to unlock innovation, enhance competition, and improve user control and choice. Backed by the UK Industrial Strategy’s £36 million investment in new schemes across financial services, energy, and beyond, these changes promise real-world impact. Open Finance alone is estimated to boost UK GDP by £30.5 billion each year.

Done well, the Data Act will mean:

• Data portability and control of your data 
• Better access to useful data
• Clearer rules and stronger protections for safety and fairness
• Greater empowerment and control for users to enable data sharing
• Foundations for better data sharing governance to enable real-world benefits of apps, AI and related tech services, while better addressing rights, consent and permission

This includes: 

• A statutory code on automated decision-making

Meaning the government will create a legally-recognised code of practice to guide organisations that use automated systems to make decisions. 

• Greater enforcement of the rules

More power to enforce data protection laws, making sure compliance isn’t optional and bad actors are held accountable.

• Increased emphasis on DPIAs (Data Protection Impact Assessments)

DPIAs are risk assessments that organisations must carry out before starting projects that involve high-risk processing of personal data (e.g., large-scale surveillance, sensitive health data).

• What about this whole AI thing?

Advanced software (such as AI and machine learning) is now being used to analyse data and in some cases to automate decision making. These systems are joining data together, in new ways across our economy. If we are to build and maintain trust, both voluntary and regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure they operate not only within the law, but also transparently and in the public interest. You can contribute to our conversation on this here. 

Why Smart Data Schemes matter for a Net Zero future

Smart Data Schemes aren’t just good for the economy – they are essential for our Net Zero future, because decarbonisation requires faster, smarter decisions powered by better data.

Over the past five years, we’ve been turning this vision into impact across energy, water, transport, finance and beyond. Our key learning so far? Implementation matters.

Our data infrastructure is maturing to deliver real-world impact. Initiatives like Open Energy are open, networked and verifiable to enable faster, better decisions to be made across systems. To deliver a net zero future we need data to flow as efficiently as energy itself. 

Through Open Energy, we’re creating a connected web of energy data and have already shown how better access to data delivers tangible, net zero-aligned outcomes. 

For example: 

• Our work with Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN), shows how improved data access can better align grid capacity with EV demand. 
• On the REACT project, we found that making data more accessible helps reduce delays in connecting green energy developers to the grid, enabling Transmission Owners to deliver critical infrastructure upgrades faster.

The Act also marks a major milestone for our work on Perseus, a national smart data initiative focused on enabling green finance for SMEs. Recently featured in the Willow Report, Perseus is a live example of how to operationalise Smart Data across sectors. Provisions in the Act (e.g. smart meter data infrastructure) directly strengthen our efforts to ensure every SME can access finance for the net-zero transition.

A decade in the making; the real work starts now

This moment is the culmination of more than a decade of work. In 2012, I was appointed founding CEO of the  Open Data Institute, as the UK became a global leader in open data policy. During my tenure, I initiated what became a founding paper asking Who owns our Data Infrastructure?. 

In 2015, I was appointed co-chair of the Open Banking Working Group that created the Open Banking Standard which proved that Smart Data Schemes could move from theory to practice, creating a blueprint for sectors like energy, telecoms, and transport. And, in 2023 I joined the UK Smart Data Council as its co-chair. 

It’s been over a decade since that initial work and the UK is once again setting the bar on data infrastructure. Legislation is just the starting line: to deliver real outcomes for our economy and our environment, we must now build on this foundation at pace, with the same ambition, urgency, and collaboration that brought us here.

Example:

Date: 15 May 2025 10:00-12:00 BST

Co-chairs: Mike Ricketts (SSEN-Distribution); Gea Winterson-Mikic (Icebreaker One)

The meeting aims were as follows:

1. Introduce Membership
2. Review the problem statement for the SIF bid
3. Introduce the Scheme and Assured Open Data

Summary:

• Members were asked the Icebreaker question “For your organisation, which is the biggest challenge, the creation of a Local Area Energy Plan or the delivery?” and it was noted that:
  • Providing the financing against the delivery plan is a challenge 
  • There is pressure from CP2030 and the growth agenda 
  • The length of planning cycles are prohibiting material delivery, with the data agenda moving more rapidly than planning timelines will allow for 
  • There could be benefit in digitalising the planning process, allowing for a smoother information exchange between regulator and regulatee 
  • Data maturity was discussed:
    • Delivery will be challenging due to  the existing barriers of lack of data maturity and poor data infrastructure in some areas 
    • Thinking must be done in the context of the ability of end-users to work with any data being published 
• It was noted that the membership and funding approach for Open Energy was presented to members. It is intended to apply for SIF funding for the presented use case 
• It was noted that the problem statement and the the bid for the SIF fund will focus on high-energy demand point integration in Oxford 
  • For the Oxford area, there are multiple DNOs. Currently, it is difficult to combine the data that is being shared with Local Authorities (LAs) as part of a LAEP. 
  • It was discussed that the data standardisation to generate the LAEP is not the key value of the use case, but rather will enable wider data sharing.
    • The real value comes from the business and industrial sector being able to access this data, through a Trust Framework, to inform the planning and deployment of low carbon technologies 
  • It was noted that a governance layer is planned for the Data Sharing Infrastructure (DSI), but the DSI may not be the platform implementing this use case in the near term
• Benefits of focusing on the problem statement were noted: 
  • There are opportunities for the end-to-end value chain if the two way flow of data can be standardised, including planning and modeling of load on the network 
  • A Trust Framework allows for an open market approach, bringing innovation, better tooling, services to mediate and a confidence surrounding data sharing 
• Members were given an update on the Assured Open Data scheme:
  • It was noted that assured open data demonstrates and requires good practice, enables provenance and solidifies long-term confidence in the data. 
  • It was noted that common scheme technical definitions, for example assurance levels, are maintained as a central specification resource at https://specification.docs.ib1.org. This enables many schemes to adopt the same specifications via their Registries and ensure interoperability with one another.
  • It was noted that there are four assurance levels for organisations, and four for datasets. These are updated versions of the ones already in use by SSEN-D on their data portal

• The scheme agreement [pdf, Google Doc for comment]
• The assurance levels:
  • Organisation assurance [specification]
  • Dataset assurance [specification]
  • Both specifications are also available in a Google Doc for comment

Please comment directly on the Google Docs if you are able, or email feedback to openenergy@ib1.org. Comments received before June 2 2025 will be considered for inclusion in the initial scheme implementation.

Background

Open Energy is proposing to add an Assured Open Data scheme to the Energy Sector Trust Framework (ESTF). The scheme has these main aims:

• Provide assurance to consumers of Open Data published by Members
• Enhance the quality, consistency, and reliability of published data
• Ensure Members comply with relevant data protection, privacy, and security regulations (e.g. members don’t publish any data subject to data protection regulations such as GDPR as Open Data under the scheme)
• Promote transparency and accountability within the data-sharing ecosystem.

The scheme incorporates updated organisational and dataset assurance levels based on feedback on the original levels that Icebreaker One announced in September 2023. These levels are already being used, for example by Open Energy members SSEN-D on their data portal.

Joining the scheme will be free to ESTF members. In order to assert the assurance levels members must execute the scheme agreement that sets out their commitments, and liabilities should they fail to meet them.

Date: 17 April 2025 14:00-16:00 BST

Co-chairs: Mike Ricketts (SSEN-Distribution); Gea Mikic (Icebreaker One)

Meeting Aims

1. Understanding what Open Energy is and the plans for 2025
2. Prioritise and validate a core use case for funding proposals

Summary:

• In response to the Icebreaker question – ‘What are your biggest challenges when making a business case for data sharing?’, participants noted:
  • Hesitancy to share data due to poor or lacking data quality, and the potential risks of sharing data in case there are regulatory repercussions  
  • There are often internal stakeholder engagement challenges as senior stakeholders struggle to see concrete evidence for the benefits of publishing data 
  • The need to flip the narrative on business value to include broader sector benefits
  • Business cases are typically based on to derived insights, which requires high money and time investment 
  • There is currently limited interest in the processing of data and how it is made ready to share 
    • The challenges of understanding end user needs, to empower them with the right data access for the problem they are trying to solve

• It was noted that the purpose of AG1 is to explore, define and prioritise use cases and case studies that illustrate the potential for market-wide scale 
• The proposed use case was discussed and members were asked how the use case could be refined further. 
  • It was noted that in the need for local government organisations’ Local Area Energy Plans (LAEPs), there is a tool developed that publishes data useful to those councils
  • Opening up a Local Energy Net Zero Accelerator (LENZA)-type tools to other users was discussed in the context of how a trust framework could allow other users to access data and tools currently available to DNOs and Local Authorities only. 
    • It is noted that some data held there is confidential. A trust framework could establish rules on who, why and how users can access certain combinations of data to e.g. accelerate deployment of low carbon technologies, electric vehicles, energy efficiency
  • It was noted that there is value in establishing a trust framework and standardising the data layer for building multiple tools 
  • The importance of interoperability was noted, with the creation of a tool needing to translate nationally to be scaled across all DNOs 
  • It was noted that the use case could be broadened to opening access to the underlying datasets themselves rather than just the LENZA tool   
• It was noted that the benefit of Open Energy’s approach is it offers the opportunity to achieve data sharing at scale with the data value chain considered, with members coming together for genuine sharing opportunities with clear value 
• It was noted that Open Energy is an opportunity to focus on use cases to demonstrate the art of the possible, looking at prior work, shaping the market architecture based upon reciprocity to facilitate data sharing.

Icebreaker One is delighted to be  inviting expressions of interest for the Advisory Groups as part of the next phase of Open Energy, an initiative that started in 2020, backed by UK public funding.

Open Energy works to create a connected web of energy data for an efficient, decentralised, net zero future. Open Energy includes three services:

1. IB1 Constellation (expert networks of professionals)
2. Icebreaking (governance-led discovery and design of Schemes)
3. Trust Services (enabling Scheme implementation at market scale, such as Search and Energy Sector Trust Framework). 

Icebreaker One is now inviting expressions of interest for the below Advisory Groups which will kick off in 2025.

AG1: Purpose, User & Market Needs

AG2: Technical implementation

AG3: Legal and licensing

AG4: Engagement & communications

AG5: Policy & regulations

On February 7, 2025, Gavin presented both Perseus and Open Energy at the Green Powered Future Mission’s (GPFM) webinar. GPFM is one of several key missions established under MI, which serves as the leading intergovernmental platform for driving clean energy advancements. What’s more, MI’s broad impact – comprising 23 countries and the European Commission (on behalf of the EU) – highlights the potential reach that Perseus and Open Energy could have.

Watch the full video presentation below:

“The value here, for all of us, is to build trust with customers, enhance green finance and help SMEs on the path to decarbonisation, in a way thats compatible with the regulatory codes and standards. It will help accelerate investment impact and make it measurable … this will simplify reporting and is entirely complimentary to existing initiatives. We’re not trying to create a new standard, we’re trying to create something that can be implemented to reduce both risk, and the burden of reporting”.

Gavin Starks on Perseus at the GPFM webinar.

At the NSTA, Sara is part of a regulatory body, pushing for security of supply and reduced emissions, as it influences industries spanning Oil & Gas, Offshore hydrogen and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). 

As Chair of the Board at Elexon, the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC) administrator for Britain’s energy system, Sara is part of an organisation that has, for some years, been proactively shifting its approach to data. An approach that it shares with UK energy regulator, Ofgem. 

A common thread

Despite being on different sides of the regulatory fence – one as a regulator and the other as a soon-to-be regulated entity – the two organisations share a common thread in their net zero ambitions, viewing data as foundational to achieving this. Sara explains that Elexon recognised, early on, the value of making data discoverable, accessible and interoperable:

“Elexon was already heading in the direction that the regulator (Ofgem) was pushing for. In June 2021, we passed a modification that stated all data under the BSC were presumed open. Now we have market-wide half hourly settlement data on the horizon, which is going to massively increase the amount of data that we have to handle”. 

Elexon saw the critical role that data would play in the future of energy, understanding that the amount of data it would need to handle was going to increase exponentially. Following appointment by Ofgem in 2021, Elexon now leads a push that will require settlement on a half-hourly basis across the entire energy retail market by the end of 2026. 

Open Energy 

Sara found herself in a similar environment of preempting regulatory drivers, when working with Icebreaker One on the Open Energy project:

“I first got involved with Icebreaker One in early 2021 and remember thinking, how are we going to get companies to open up their data without a regulatory push? They either need to be able to see the advantages for themselves or need to be required to do it. Otherwise, it all seems quite theoretical.” 

The Open Energy project looked at how energy data should be classified, laying the foundational principles of Trust Frameworks while delving deep into work on APIs (application programming interface). Crucially, the project was use-case centric, questioning why and for what purpose the energy industry would want to open up their data. Potential benefits for EV charging infrastructure and solar energy offered two suitable use cases and potential answers to this question. 

“There’s been a number of developments in the energy sector since this work. Most notable is a recognition of the importance of automatic asset registration. Installers  have to share data on location of certain assets with their local network operator. It’s a prime example of people being more aware of the issues and the possibilities that can arise from sharing data” 

Water sector woes

The energy sector looks to be leading the charge in their approach to data. Compare this to the water sector, and we see an industry that is seemingly lagging behind. One potential reason for this disparity and a driver for the energy sector’s progress is competition. 

“I’m a firm believer that competition drives innovation, this certainly rings true when it comes to data. Competition opens up possibilities and aids the development of new ideas. And, as companies look at new ways to innovate, having more open and better-quality data only expands these possibilities”. 

Political Pressures 

With Labour’s recent victory in the UK general election, our thoughts now turn to how this change in government might impact Elexon and the NSTA. For the NSTA, whose sole shareholder is the Secretary of State, the change in government could bring in different opinions on which direction the regulator should take. 

For Elexon, the expectation is that the direction of the company will not change. And, more positively, the new government is looking to accelerate progress towards a zero carbon electricity system. Despite this, there may be a slowing down of progress in certain areas. The organisation is due to be industry-owned, for example, transitioning from the newly set-up National Energy System Operator (NESO). The outcome of the election could slow this process. 

“With any new administration, roles change and it is likely to take some time for things to get back on track again – although the Labour government does seem to have hit the ground running”.