In October, we reconvened Stream’s Steering Group which comprises experts that represent water companies, regulators, research, innovation bodies and government.
Co-chaired by Icebreaker One and NWL, the group’s primary function is to help provide leadership and market signalling. Oversight of, and endorsement from, this group will establish a lasting set of robust governance measures to ensure data is shared safely and with the correct regulations.
Date: 13 October 2025 10:00-12:00 BST
Location: online
Co-Chairs: Melissa Tallack (NWL); Gavin Starks (IB1)
Secretariat: IB1
Meeting Aims
- Improved understanding & support regarding the Discovery work (in the context of the use case water efficiency fund for pan utility interoperability)
- Vote on Q4 outcomes
- Collaborate on the Independent Water Commission Review items
Summary:
Outcomes:
- It was noted that Q4 activities are focused on data quality improvements, CReDO refinement, platform analytics, and preparing Stream’s infrastructure and processes for 2026 readiness.
- It was discussed that the ecosystem pillar, particularly around leadership, strategic clarity, and publisher-consumer coordination, is central to Stream’s long-term value and will require active support and championing through Phase 3.
Project collaboration opportunities:
- It was noted that:
- Stream is supporting two aligned bids to the Water Breakthrough Challenge Fund: CaSTCo (led by United Utilities) and Riverdeep Mountain AI (RDMAI), both of which seek to use Stream for data provision and verification, citizen science infrastructure, and model enhancement.
- Mobilisation on Stream’s side would follow confirmation of bid success (expected April at the earliest), though early engagement on Section 82 and member discussions may be beneficial.
Marketing strategy:
- It was noted that:
- Audience segmentation is structured into Tier 1 (regulators, policymakers, etc.) and Tier 2 (civic tech, students, etc.).
- The strategy will be delivered through four content pillars, with the current focus on trust and storytelling via Open October.
A strategic response to the Cunliffe review:
- It was agreed that:
- The Cunliffe review presents a key opportunity for Stream to represent the best collective industry response to its proposals.
- The 32 relevant recommendations presented on the Miro board require senior-level socialisation to assess their strategic importance, particularly given the varying stages of progress and resource constraints across member companies.
- It was discussed that:
- Key opportunities include monitoring under Section 82, harmonising smart meter standards, and improving infrastructure data reporting
- It would be worth running a workshop to divide items into short, medium and long-term aims.
Water Efficiency Fund
- It was noted that the programme will consist of two parts: a national Water Efficiency Campaign and a Water Efficiency Lab for innovation testing.
- It was agreed that robust data access plans must be in place by mid-2026, including anonymised smart meter and water consumption data with national coverage.
